The Political Adventures of New Jersey's "Highly Partisan" Tomato
 
Author: Lisa Anderson
Date: 4/30/2005
Publication: Chicago Tribune
 
You say to-may-toe, I say toe-mah-toe. New Jersey Republicans say it's a fruit, Democrats say it's a vegetable. And, though botanists side firmly with the fruit faction in this political food fight, state legislators have introduced bills designating the tomato as the official state vegetable.

"The tomato is a highly partisan issue in New Jersey," said Clay Richards, assistant director of the Connecticut-based Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, which conducted a survey on the topic in March. It found that more Republicans and independent voters are in the fruit camp, while Democrats lean to the vegetable side.

That it's an issue at all is somewhat embarrassing for the Garden State, which long has lacked a signature vegetable. It didn't even have a state fruit until 2003, when the blueberry was picked, squeezing out the tomato for that honor.

Bruised but undaunted, the much-vaunted Jersey tomato is back in play, possibly facing a challenge from sweet corn, which is rumored to have the ears of some at the Statehouse in Trenton.

"We respect their opinions, but sweet corn has not had the impact on New Jersey that the tomato has," said Ira Shaffer, a passionate proponent of the proposed legislation and chairman of the New Jersey Tomato Festival Inc. It will hold its second annual event Aug. 21 in Camden--complete with salsa bands and a tomato-throwing "war" in the manner of Spain's annual La Tomatina tomato brawl in Bunol.

By now, one well might wonder how it is that the tomato, squashed in its bid to become first fruit, now qualifies to run for state vegetable.

"Everybody knows, botanically, it's a fruit, but legally it's a vegetable," said Shaffer, who wants the tomato to do for New Jersey what the potato did for Idaho.

Tariff dispute bore fruit

He's right on the legal aspect and that goes for American tomatoes everywhere, not just in New Jersey. In 1893, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Nix vs. Hedden that the tomato is, indeed, a vegetable.

Handling a dispute over tariffs imposed on imported vegetables but not fruits, the highest court in the land arrived at its decision based on the dictates of the dining room. It reasoned that tomatoes, close relations of potatoes, eggplants, red peppers and other members of the Solanaceae plant family, are used traditionally as vegetables, in appetizers and entrees, but rarely, if ever, in desserts, the domain of fruits.

That provided the loophole for the tomato's new campaign to be the state VIP of vegetables. A class of 4th graders in Marlboro provided the impetus. Following the green-thumb strategy of 4th graders from Ocean County who successfully pushed the blueberry to victory in 2003, they lobbied for legislation on the tomato.

Democrats in both chambers of the Legislature have cultivated the cause. For state Sen. Ellen Karcher, who co-sponsored a May 2004 bill with Sen. Barbara Buono, it was the second time around with the tomato, which she also championed for the fruit category.

This time, she said, "It's a little heavier lift than something we're sure is a vegetable--I'm sure corn is a vegetable."

Nonetheless, Karcher considers these bills an exercise through which children can learn how laws are made--and a rare opportunity for some lighter moments in a legislative calendar brimming with battles over the budget, school funding and property taxes.

She is, however, a bit torn between tomatoes and sweet corn, she said. " I would love to have both. My personal preference is that there is nothing better than Jersey corn and Jersey tomatoes as a great meal for the summer. But I do believe there is real momentum behind the tomato."

An ingredient of state history

As well there should be, given the tomato's illustrious role in New Jersey history. Originally a South American plant, tomatoes took root in the U.S. early in the 19th Century, but often were used more as garden ornament than salad ingredient due to fears that they were poisonous.

In 1820, legend has it, Robert Gibbon Johnson decided to prove their safety by vowing to eat a basket of them on the steps of the Salem County courthouse in New Jersey. According to food historian Waverley Root, Johnson did, survived and changed the course of American culinary history. It is believed that Harrison Crosby of Jamesburg canned the nation's first tomatoes in 1847.

And in 1869, what eventually would become the Campbell Soup Co. was founded in Camden, a site chosen for its proximity to the state's tomato farms. One of New Jersey's largest employers, the company still churns out the famous tomato soup Joseph Campbell began to produce in 1895--along with V8 cocktail vegetable juice, Prego sauces and a host of other products involving tomatoes--but at a volume that long ago eclipsed the production ability of the Garden State alone.

It really is the Garden State

Naming the tomato as state vegetable is good for New Jersey, said Douglas Fisher, who co-sponsored a matching bill in the Assembly with fellow Assemblyman Patrick Deignan Jr. earlier this year. "In a corridor state such as New Jersey, where it is highly compacted, densely populated and incredibly traveled, any time we can create awareness of the impact agriculture has in the state . . . we want to be able to do that."

According to the 2002 agricultural census, New Jersey is home to 9,000 farmers, a third of whom make the majority of their living from farming, said Peter Furey , executive director of the New Jersey Farm Bureau, a non-profit trade association.

In 2002, New Jersey produced 79.1 million pounds of sweet corn, ranking 12th nationally in harvested acres. It produced 75.9 million pounds of tomatoes, ranking eighth in the country, according to the state's department of agriculture. And it produced 42 million pounds of cultivated blueberries, second only to Michigan.

Fisher, who is vice chairman of the Assembly's agriculture and natural resources committee, said the elevation of the tomato is long overdue. "I think this would have been done years ago, except for the notion of whether it's a vegetable or a fruit," he said. "I especially became involved because I was a grocer for 30 years. In the produce section, I don't ever recall putting tomatoes in the fruit section."

Some states simply refuse to stew over such questions: in 1987, Arkansas adopted the Vine Ripe Pink Tomato as both the state fruit and vegetable.

Not an issue for all

And some people simply don't care at all. In fact, while 49 percent of all voters surveyed supported the designation of the tomato as New Jersey's state vegetable in the Quinnipiac poll, 50 percent thought the whole thing was a waste of time.

Richard Mumma, 49, a publishing executive from Long Branch, N.J. is one of them. "I don't think you need a state fruit or vegetable," he said, during a lunchtime stroll near Hoboken's waterfront. "Although I am glad the state bird is a goldfinch. I do like the goldfinch."

Meanwhile, no one is quite sure if the tomato bill will come up for a vote before the legislative session ends in June. But if it does, said Quinnipiac's Richards, "Since Democrats control the Legislature, it appears unlikely that there will be enough votes to block the bill, especially with strong bipartisan support on how to pronounce tomato."

According to the poll, 95 percent of all voters surveyed say toe-may-toe and 4 percent say toe-mah-toe.

 

online source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/chitribts/20050430/ts_chicagotrib/ thepoliticaladventuresofnewjerseyshighlypartisantomato

 

 

 
 

 

 

Copyright 2003-2008 JerseyPride.com - Privacy